Did you reboot or at least rmmod/modprobe your scsi card beore changing
the scanner's scsi id?


On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 07:04 +0800, Ted Parks wrote:
> Checking the place in the SCSI chain indicated on the small dial on my 
> ScanJet 4C, I discovered the scanner was set on 7. I changed it to 0 and 1, 
> but Sane still cannot find the scanner.
> 
> My continuing questions:
> 1) What should the SCSI setting be for the ScanJet? 0? It is the only device 
> I have connected to the SCSI port. As Martin suggested, changing the setting 
> from 7 cleared up the repetitions in dmesg, where the machine found the 
> scanner 7 times! But Sane still does not see the ScanJet.
> 
> 2) Dmesg still has two entries associated with the scanner:
> 
> First:
> 
> SCSI subsystem initialized
> PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 0000:00:10.0
> PCI: Sharing IRQ 9 with 0000:00:07.2
> scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.36
>         <Adaptec 2940 SCSI adapter>
>         aic7870: Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/253 SCBs
>  
>   Vendor: HP        Model: C2520A            Rev: 3503
>   Type:   Processor                          ANSI SCSI revision: 02
> Attached scsi generic sg0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0,  type 3
> 
> Then:
> 
>   Vendor: HP        Model: C2520A            Rev: 3503
>   Type:   Processor                          ANSI SCSI revision: 02
> Attached scsi generic sg0 at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0,  type 3
> 
> This seems to me, perhaps because of my inexperience with SCSI, that 
> FedoraCore is attaching the scanner in two places. Why is sg0 found at scsi0 
> in the first entry, then at scsi1 in the second? If this is an error, how do 
> I correct it?
> 
> 3) Finally, to provide a fuller account of my problem, the output from 
> sane-find-scanner follows. Is it normal for a usb scanner to appear, even 
> though none is attached?
> 
> [root@localhost tparks]# sane-find-scanner
>  
>   # No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make sure 
> that
>   # you have loaded a SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter.
>  
> found USB scanner (vendor=0x049f, product=0x505a) at libusb:001:002
>   # Your USB scanner was (probably) detected. It may or may not be supported 
> by
>   # SANE. Try scanimage -L and read the backend's manpage.
>  
>   # Scanners connected to the parallel port or other proprietary ports can't 
> be
>   # detected by this program.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ted Parks
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Collins" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [sane-devel] ScanJet 4C
> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 04:34:16 +0100
> 
> > 
> > On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 08:41:42 +0800
> > "Ted Parks" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Attached scsi generic sg0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0,  type 3
> > ...
> > > Attached scsi generic sg6 at scsi0, channel 0, id 6, lun 0,  type 3
> > >
> > > But, when I run sane-find-scanner, sane reports that there are no
> > > SCSI scanners attached, instead finding a USB scanner that does not
> > > exist. I created a symbolic link between /dev/scanner and 
> > > /dev/sg0. What am I doing wrong?
> > 
> > The scanner should only be found once not seven times. Have you set
> > the ID on the scanner and terminated the chain properly?
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
> > --
> > sane-devel mailing list: [email protected]
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
> > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
> >               to [email protected]
> 
> -- 
> ______________________________________________
> Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org 
> This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
> 
> Powered by Outblaze
> 


Reply via email to