Hello Allan, yes I use Suse 9.2.
I deinstalled sane with Suse and I downloaded Sane 1.0.15 and builded it myself. Now the resmgr-erreo is away, but I still can't scan: linux:/home/cneugeb # /usr/local/bin/scanimage -L device `canon630u:libusb:001:003' is a CANON Canoscan FB630U flatbed scanner device `test:0' is a Noname frontend-tester virtual device device `test:1' is a Noname frontend-tester virtual device linux:/home/cneugeb # /usr/local/bin/scanimage scanimage: sane_start: Device busy and that gives me those entrys in /var/log/messages: Jan 12 23:27:16 linux kernel: usb 1-1: control timeout on ep0out Jan 12 23:27:16 linux kernel: usb 1-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd scanimage rqt 64 rq 12 len 1 ret -110 Jan 12 23:27:16 linux kernel: usb 1-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd scanimage rqt 64 rq 12 len 1 ret -71 Jan 12 23:27:17 linux last message repeated 381 times Christian m. allan noah wrote: > you are using suse, or some other distibution with resource manager > compiled into sane. i wonder if just downloading and building sane > yourself (without resmgr) might help? > > allan > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 [email protected] wrote: > > Bertrik Sikken wrote: > >> [email protected] wrote: > >>> This is my output of lsusb : > >>> Bus 005 Device 003: ID 07cc:0350 Carry Computer Eng., Co., Ltd > >>> Bus 005 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 > >>> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 > >>> Bus 003 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 > >>> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 > >>> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:2204 Canon, Inc. CanoScan FB630U > >>> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> and I have this canonfb630u.conf file: > >>> > >>> # Options for the canonusb backend > >>> > >>> # Autodetect the Canon CanoScan FB630u > >>> usb 0x04a9 0x2204 > >>> > >>> # device list for non-linux-systems (enable if autodetect fails): > >>> #/dev/scanner > >>> #/dev/usb/scanner0 > >>> usb 0x4a9 0x2204 . > >> > >> The '.' at the end of the line is a cut-and-paste error I presume? > > > > Yes, the '.' is not in the file. > > > >>> scanimage -L can detect my scanner: > >>> linux:/etc/sane.d # scanimage -L > >>> device `canon630u:libusb:001:003' is a CANON Canoscan FB630U flatbed > >>> scanner > >> > >> Good. This means a lot of stuff works already. > >> > >>> but when I try to scan: > >>> linux:/etc/sane.d # scanimage > >>> scanimage: sane_start: Device busy > >>> > >>> and I get those entrys in /var/log/messages > >>> Jan 11 21:34:40 linux scanimage: resmgr: server response code 502 > >>> Jan 11 21:34:40 linux last message repeated 8 times > >>> Jan 11 21:34:40 linux scanimage: resmgr: server response code 200 > >>> Jan 11 21:34:40 linux last message repeated 4 times > >>> Jan 11 21:34:40 linux scanimage: resmgr: server response code 501 > >>> Jan 11 21:35:10 linux kernel: usb 1-1: control timeout on ep0out > >>> Jan 11 21:35:10 linux kernel: usb 1-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed > >>> cmd scanimage rqt 64 rq 12 len 1 ret -110 > >>> Jan 11 21:35:10 linux kernel: usb 1-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed > >>> cmd scanimage rqt 64 rq 12 len 1 ret -71 > >> > >> No idea why it says "USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed", could be a kernel > >> problem. Also the "scanimage: resmgr: server response code" does > >> not look familiar to me, sorry. > >> > >> Stupid question: does it work when you run it as root? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Bertrik > > > > No, it does not work when I try it as root, no difference if I call it as > > root or as normal user. > > > > Regards > > Christian __________________________________________________ :-) kassiere für jede versandte eMail 2,0 Cent (-: http://www.mysc.de --- http://www.mysc.at
