This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
--1386613362-494497759-1120673779=:29890 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT jeff, any fujitsu with EOX2 on the end is not supported by the sane fujitsu backend. as far as i can tell, those scanners share no electronics with the 'C' versions of the same model. in fact, i have a 4110EOX2, and it is really an MA1509 Mustek chip. i expect that the other EOX2 models are similar. the fi-5110C and the fi-4120C (and C2) work pretty well, i have about 100 of all three. the fi-4120C (no 2) is a little flaky on usb, but the other two seem a little better behaved. the 5110C is noisier, and perhaps only 3/4 the speed of the 4120, but they use the same comm protocol. allan On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote: > Has anyone had occasion to use the following Fujitsu scanner with the current > SANE fujitsu back-end? > > Fujitsu Fi-5110EOX2 600 x 600dpi USB Interface Sheet Fed/Document Fed Scanner > > I'd been planning on a Fujitsu Fi-4120C2, which costs more than twice as much. > I presume that despite similar external appearances, the two Fujitsu scanners > have completely different internal mechanisms and electronics (hence different > SANE compatibility characteristics). The Fi-4120C2 is most likely worth the > extra money. > > Still, if the Fi-5110EOX2 works with the current fujitsu back end equally > well, > I'd like to get a couple of these cheaper units for lower volume users. > Thanks. > > > > ____________________________________________________ > Sell on Yahoo! Auctions no fees. Bid on great items. > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > -- "so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know. money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera --1386613362-494497759-1120673779=:29890--
