Sorry should have mentioned that in the previous post. The Xerox 4800 One touch does indeed have the same Product and Vendor ID as the Visioneer 4800 One touch
-- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060108/1f2cbc07/attachment.htm From [email protected] Sun Jan 8 12:46:22 2006 From: [email protected] (Henning Meier-Geinitz) Date: Sun Jan 8 12:47:24 2006 Subject: [sane-devel] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Hi, On 2006-01-08 12:05, Ben Tasker wrote: > Sorry should have mentioned that in the previous post. The Xerox 4800 One > touch does indeed have the same Product and Vendor ID as the Visioneer 4800 > One touch Thanks, I'll add it to our lists. As the Visioneer 4800 is already quite long in our lists and nobody has written a backend yet I guess it's still up to you to write one :-) The chipset seems to be Realtek RTS8801B. I don't know how similar this is compared to which is supported by the hp3500 backend http://projects.troy.rollo.name/rt-scanners/ but it may help nevertheless. Bye, Henning
