On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, [utf-8] Ren? Rebe wrote: >>> 820, but i have used the fujitsu sp15c with the avision backend, and >>> its adf works. look at the options the backend provides using > > Allan: You used the Avision backend with the sp15c and all worked fine? > Can we start to disable the backend in CVS so people really start using > the more advanced and maintained avision driver with their Avision > OEM models?
haha- you are 'tooting your own horn' a bit there are ya? all i did was take the sp15c out of its box, do a couple scans, made that little patch that made the adf work, and put it back in its box. that was a couple years ago now, so i cant really comment on how well it works. i cant really play with it right now, i am supposed to be working :) but given your responsiveness, i say we disable the sp15c backend, and you can clean up the mess in avision :) allan > > Your, > > -- "so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know. money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera From [email protected] Thu Mar 23 15:08:14 2006 From: [email protected] (m. allan noah) Date: Thu Mar 23 15:09:17 2006 Subject: [sane-devel] ADF detection In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, [utf-8] Ren? Rebe wrote: >> i like 'ADF Front' instead of just 'ADF', i think it is more consistent. >> but i do like your ordering better, so i think i shall do this: >> >> "Flatbed|ADF Front|ADF Back|ADF Duplex" > > Well, on non duplex devices "ADF Front" might be misleading > and people search for the Back option? Somehow I like just ADF. so duplex and non-duplex get different lists. > >> and if a fujitsu ever gets film, i would change 'Flatbed'. > > I'm right now thinkin where an sepearte transparency switch > is not too bad, because I heared that there "might be" ADFs > "some time soon" that are able to scan transparencies. Since > the devices do not exist yet I do not know whether this mode > will just work due placing the lamp where it always shines thru > transparency or whether it has to be enabled. In the later case > a seperate "enable transparency" switch might be better > than the transparency source ... right- and i dont see how transparency could work in duplex mode :) so you have to do some manipulation of the source option based on the transparency option, which puts you right back where we started. > >>>> can you change avision to the same? >>> >>> My best client will scream, but yes ,-) >> >> haha- you getting paid for this? > > Not for the "for the sake" changes like strings of modes, but for > certain parts of the coding, yes - these days. When you look > carefully on our homepage you will also see that due to our > relationship from the Linux work, Avision contracted us to do > the OS X TWAIN driver. > > (but so far the balance of that work is not that black). Linux work > is more profitable than OS X stuff (so far for us). cool. dont change anything just cause i want to. but i do think a little more consistency between backends would be good... allan -- "so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know. money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera From [email protected] Thu Mar 23 14:32:08 2006 From: [email protected] (Don Bossung) Date: Thu Mar 23 15:11:50 2006 Subject: [sane-devel] Fedora Core 4/SANE/HP 1510 Message-ID: <000501c64e86$91066f20$6500a8c0@toshiba> Hello List, I have the following installed Fedora Core 4 hplip-0.9.8-3.2 libsane-hpaio-0.9.8-3.2 sane-backends-1.0.17-0.fc4.1 xsane-0.95-3 HP PSC1510 The scanner works fine on the Fedora box. Networking is my problem. I am using SaneTwain on a windows box and have followed the man pages for saned to setup networking. I have created a user named saned with a group saned Saned.conf holds the IP address of the windows client. Dll.conf holds hpaio and net I have added: sane-port 6566/tcp # SANE network scanner daemon to /etc/services I have created the file sane-port in /etc/xinetd.d holding service sane-port { port = 6566 socket_type = stream wait = no user = saned group = saned server = /usr/sbin/saned } When I start SaneTwain and setup the host (by ip address not name) I get a 'Error establishing connection to host' message. To help troubleshoot this I started saned with debugging on the server using SANE_DEBUG_HPAIO=128 saned -d128 To my surprise, SaneTwain on the windows client found the scanner and it works fine. When I kill the debug on the server, the problem starts again. So, it appears that I am not getting saned to work as a daemon properly???? Any help would be appreciated Doin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060323/c59293b0/attachment.htm From [email protected] Thu Mar 23 15:05:33 2006 From: [email protected] ([email protected]) Date: Thu Mar 23 17:36:48 2006 Subject: [sane-devel] Accessing scanners on network addresable MFP? Message-ID: <[email protected]> Thanks for the reply Jon. I tried the dell_scan perl script for my requirement(RICOH's MFP). I just changed port number in the script and tried "--find" option. It did not work. Guess I need a bit more of reading. Is there a is generic driver for MFP's? -Satish -----Original Message----- From: Jon Chambers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 3:17 AM To: satish kumar (WT01 - Embedded Systems) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Accessing scanners on network addresable MFP? Hi Satish, On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, [email protected] wrote: > [...] I am trying to access network > addressable highend MFP over my LAN. Does SANE support such > configuration or is their any such tool available for Linux? I am in the process of adding network scanning support for the Dell 1600n MFP and Alessandro Zummo is working on one of the Epson MFP models. As far as I know no other network scanners are currently supported. (I could be wrong.) For my own part, with a new baby imminent I suspect that the dell1600n_net_scan backend could be a little while coming but in the unlikely event that that is the MFP you have, there is a standalone network scanning driver at http://www.jon.demon.co.uk/dell1600n-net-scan/ cheers, Jon ====================== Jon Chambers ===================== http://www.jon.demon.co.uk, 020 8575 7097, 07969 956575 ========================================================= The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
