I have a problem when want to debug the xsane to detect where the sm3600 was ?
it appears no device ? first of all the xsane in /usr/bin/xsane it work, then
if in /usr/local/bin/xsane, it cannot find out the scanner ? and I have
question to ask , because fc5 is have no /etc/hotplug anymore, and is being
replace /etc/udev/60-libsane.rules, I already see the sm3600 is already there,
is it the xsane will always look the data in 60-libsane.rules to see the device
is supported by xsane /sane ? but why in sane-find-scanner it cannot find out
the scanner, neither the scanimage -L but the xsane in /usr/bin/xsane it can
work normally ?
I need explaination
Thank you for advance
Sofian
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060410/9e0b1f80/attachment.html
From [email protected] Mon Apr 10 15:24:55 2006
From: [email protected] (Colin Brace)
Date: Mon Apr 10 15:25:09 2006
Subject: [sane-devel] gimp error msg calling xsane
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
On 4/9/06, Henning Meier-Geinitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2006-04-06 14:38, Colin Brace wrote:
> > On my Fedora Core 5 system, xsane 0.99 in standalone mode works fine
> > with my scanner; it also works fine from within gimp v2.2.10. But when I
> > launch it from within gimp v2.3.7, I get a peculiar error message:
> >
> > Failed to open device `gimp':
> > Invalid argument
>
> Looks like xsane wants to open a SANE device called "gimp". Quite
> strange.
FYI: this problem was fixed when the package xsane-gimp was updated
several days ago (current version 0.99-2.2).
--
Colin Brace
Amsterdam
From [email protected] Mon Apr 10 19:52:54 2006
From: [email protected] (Henning Meier-Geinitz)
Date: Mon Apr 10 19:54:50 2006
Subject: [sane-devel] Backend for Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400.
In-Reply-To: <1144502468.3791.23.camel@serge2>
References: <1144502468.3791.23.camel@serge2>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Hi,
On 2006-04-08 15:21, Serge Leblanc wrote:
> Here requested logs.
Thanks. I'll add them to our website.
> It is possible to have an developmnent effort on this scanner ? I
> will like to make it myself but I don't have C programing since 8
> years.
As far as I know nobody is working on a backend for this scanner. So
it's really up to you.
Bye,
Henning
