On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:22:54 +0100 (BST), Jon Chambers wrote: > I recently made a small change to configure.in, regenerated configure (by > running autoconf) and checked the files into CVS. > > While my changes do not explicitly impose the restrictions that you > describe it is possible that my version of autoconf is not playing nicely.
I suspected something like this. > If you have autoconf you could try running it and see if the resulting > configure script works better for you. I will try. > Other SANE folks: Is there an officially blessed version of autoconf > that should be used for this? - your configure says it's generated from 2.59d - autoconf -web-page tells to _not_ use these experimental builds for production - the former configure (that works) was built with 2.59 But I don't know what's official Bye, Franz
