On Friday 09 June 2006 14:17, Rene Rebe wrote:
> Hi,
>
>....
>
> The device already contains some comments that it might be neded, look at
> this:
>
> { "MINOLTA", "FS-V1",
> 0x0638, 0x026a,
> "Minolta", "Dimage Scan Dual II",
> AV_FILMSCANNER}, /* maybe AV_ONE_CALIB_CMD */
> /* comment="1 pass, film-scanner" */
> /* status="good" */
>
> Can you try if you make the line:
>
> AV_FILMSCANNER | AV_ONE_CALIB_CMD
>
You are right. It was not complicated and the comment said all that was
needed. Sorry for not reading carefully.
> Can you also please send me a log with calibration with
> SANE_DEBUG_AVISION=7 ?
>
I am attaching the files calib_orig and calib_one_cmd.
A problem is now appearing when scanning, at the end of the process some data
is lost. I am also attaching a scan log, as this situation may eventually
have a solution as simple as the previous....
Regards
ZP
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: calib_orig.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 5266 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060614/e6411bbe/calib_orig-0001.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: calib_one_cmd.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 5139 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060614/e6411bbe/calib_one_cmd-0001.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: scan_one_cmd.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 5235 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060614/e6411bbe/scan_one_cmd-0001.bin
From [email protected] Wed Jun 14 19:59:56 2006
From: [email protected] (Jon Chambers)
Date: Wed Jun 14 20:00:22 2006
Subject: [sane-devel] scanimage --batch
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Hi,
I have been testing the dell1600n_net backend against the daily snapshots
and have noticed the following: If I run
scanimage --batch --batch-count=3"
then I can scan three pages fine. If I just do
scanimage --batch
and press ctrl-c a couple of times while it is waiting on the 4th page
then my last (3rd) image will be slightly truncated. Multipage scanning
works fine with xsane.
My guess would be an unflushed file buffer that is lost when killed by an
interrupt?
cheers,
Jon
====================== Jon Chambers =====================
http://www.jon.demon.co.uk, 020 8575 7097, 07931 961669
=========================================================
