Hello, On Jul 4 13:02 Mogens J?ger wrote (shortened): > make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/mogens/Programmer/Gimp-relateret/sane-backends-1.0.18/doc' > Generating index for sane.ps... > make[1]: *** [sane.ind] Error 1 ... > My system is SuSE10.1 on an AMD64 bit, > scanner is an Epson perfection 2450Photo = GT9700 attached to the > firewire port. > When trying to install the 'epkowa' package, I am told to install sane > first
Why don't you use our sane package for Suse Linux 10.1 for AMD64 bit together with the matching sane-32bit package which we provide especially for AMD64 bit so that even binary-only i386-only stuff like Image Scan should work even on an AMD64 bit system. In any case: This is not a SANE problem but a problem caused by the binary-only i386-only Image Scan and you should ask where you got this software to provide also a ready-to-use version for AMD64 bit. Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5 Mail: [email protected] 90409 Nuernberg, Germany WWW: http://www.suse.de/ From [email protected] Tue Jul 4 23:05:19 2006 From: [email protected] (Bertrik Sikken) Date: Tue Jul 4 23:06:09 2006 Subject: [sane-devel] HP Scanjet 4370 In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dean Loros wrote: > Just bought a HP Scanjet 4370 (didn't check to see support :-( ). > Running the current Sane front & backends--Have installed hp3900-sane > from Sourceforge. Problem is that the only scan I get is totally > black--I've worked with all the options. I get a note as I close Xsane > that "Failed to create file: Permission denied". Any Ideas/suggestions?? Considering the model name, this scanner is possibly compatible with the scanjet 4300 for which a backend (niash) exists. I noticed that the sane-project.org search engine claims that it contains a REALTEK RTS8822BL-02A (probably based on sane-find-scanner output), which would mean that it is NOT supported by the niash backend. Has anyone actually opened up the scanner and checked the chip numbers? Regards, Bertrik -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEqvQvETD6mlrWxPURAo5lAJsH1jB5gGoBbFxUsVGtKL2bIcnlwgCfSvHO W4/VlHguTP3VQcTDgXnDHZk= =lNOj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
