> Did you try this sequence: > convert <filename.png> -profile scanner.icc -profile monitor.icc <new > filename.png> >
>> CNZ005.ICC is the wrong profile. CNS12I.ICC is for your scanner. >> But you need the same brightness, contrast, gamma, ... settings as the >> windows driver before applying the profile. >> You'll get better results if you create your own profile in Linux. Thanks for your answers ! With the good profile and with this command line, the scanned picture is better but it is still far from being perfect. I think I will follow your advice and I will buy a IT8.7 scanner calibration targets. I have found some on this website http://www.targets.coloraid.de/ Promise, I will post the result of my calibration:) Philippe > m.vr.gr. > Gerard Klaver > > On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 11:58 +0100, Philippe Dumont wrote: > >> I am sorry but it does not work :( >> I seems to be the good solution according to the paper I have read. >> Is it a problem of icc profile, or a problem in sane ? >> >> Best regards >> >> Philippe >> >> >> OS : linux 2.6.16.19 SMP PREEMPT >> scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.18; backend version 1.0.18 >> scanner : canon lide 30 >> >> >> >> >> Daniel Gl?ckner a ?crit : >>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:50:49PM +0100, Philippe Dumont wrote: >>>> I have done : >>>> scanimage -i cnz005.icc --resolution 600 > image.tiff >>>> or >>>> convert -profile cnz005.icc before.tiff after.tiff >>>> But nothing happened and the image was still the same. >>> You need a viewer that knows how to deal with embedded ICC profiles. >>> >>> If want it to work in all viewers, you need to convert the image to your >>> destination colorspace (you want sRGB): >>> >>> scanimage -i cnz005.icc --resolution 600 > image.tiff >>> AND >>> convert -profile sRGB.icc image.tiff after.tiff >>> >>> http://www.color.org/ -> Resources -> Profiles >>> >>> Daniel >>> >> >>
