abel deuring <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,

> It could be that the JX250 is much more sensistive to latency problems
> than other scanners... I'll test your patch during the next days (sorry,
> I can't make at present a more precise and honest promise...). But I

NP, as long as we're getting somewhere with this :)

> already made some test scans with sane-backends 1.0.18 and a modified
> sharp.conf file that disables queueing on the SG level: No performance
> problems with a 1.6 GHZ Athlon mainboard and a SCSI controller for the
> sym53c8xx driver. (I don't have a slower system available...)

I think the command queueing really helps only when the backend has to
do some (heavy) post processing on the scanner data; I don't really
see how it helps otherwise, other than latency problems at the SCSI
level (kernel or bus).

JB.

-- 
Julien BLACHE                                   <http://www.jblache.org> 
<[email protected]>                                  GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169

Reply via email to