Dale Amon <[email protected]> wrote: Hi,
> I note that it really does not like the 150dpi which I > have been more or less standardized on for my scanning > for the last decade. I'll have to go to 200dpi. Is there > any reason it gives garbage output on 150? According to the original announce, the backend does not support scanning at 150 dpi, so that would explain what you're seeing, though it shouldn't let you scan at that resolution if it's not supported. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> <[email protected]> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
