"m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote: Hi,
>> If converting a backend to SANE2 can be done in a week-end as Oliver >> suggested, I can't see why we could not convert existing backends, >> even if unmaintained. > > SANE2 has not been touched in years, and the folks that are now around > to actually implement it, are not the ones that wrote it. You can bet > we will have to re-examine every change in the current draft before > anyone writes any code. hence, my desire to do something small that we > can agree on. I share that view. >> Maybe this time we will be able to actually get something done, >> otherwise I'm afraid SANE might be doomed as it would mean it's just >> unable to evolve. > > it might only be a small step, but this time, we ARE going to move. Which is good news :) JB. -- Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> <jb at jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
