On 1/16/08, Alessandro Zummo <azummo-lists at towertech.it> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:41:15 -0500 > "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > we are in feature freeze for the pending release now, so it's too late > > to get it in sane, unless we are willing to let the release date slip. > > Since we anticipate more regular releases in the future, i am inclined > > to hold off on this until next time. comments from other devels? > > > well, given that is a whole new backend, and for a single model, > even if it doesn't work, it shouldn't alter the stability of other parts of > SANE. > > I'd include it, having it in the wild would lead to more bug reports > than within the development cvs, where maybe there is no-one with that > scanner model.
the patch does apply cleanly, and builds with far few errors than most other sane backends, so it is perhaps reasonable to include it. the only thing i see strange about it, is that it does not use DBG macro at all. perhaps the backend is perfect, and therefor does not need debugging output, but our users systems can be messed up in odd ways which can be quickly solved with a little debugging. Couriousous- are you up for adding some DBG calls (look at any other backend for examples) allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
