J?rgen Ernst schrieb: > Pierre Willenbrock schrieb: >> The LiDE 70 is a gl841 based scanner, and those are dumb scanners with >> very few firmware. > > I am wondering. According to > http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/canon-lide-70.html I found that > the output of sane-find-scanner didn't identify this scanner as GL841 > based. How did you find this? > > Canon LiDE 600F has only 2 endpoints. > Canon LiDE 70 has also only 2 endpoints. >
Sorry, confused it with the LiDE 90, which was the orignal subject of this thread. > So I wanted to read a usb log to check if the protocol is the same. > > Canon LiDE 35 uses 3 endpoints. So it's different. > >> A log of my gl841 based Canon LiDE 35 can be found here: >> http://pirsoft-dsl-dropzone.de/usbsnoop.log.bz2 > > Your log shows many URB_FUNCTION_VENDOR_DEVICE lines. > Canon LiDE 600F doesn't use any vendor device function. > As far as I know... > This means I can't find any in my log. > > Canon LiDE 35 has definitely not the same protocol. > > If you want to check yourself my logs, have a look at > http://www.juergen-ernst.de/info_sane.html Regards, Pierre