Hi, > i think the best you can do is to require that the backend accept > alternate names for the scanner if it is going to use something other > than the list you gave above.
Sorry, i didn't mean to impose one unique device name, but as you said, simply require one common naming for supporting HAL rather than imposing UDI everywhere in SANE. The idea of alternative naming is very good. I vote for it. Regards, ?tienne.
