On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Rene Rebe wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday 02 October 2006 20:19, m. allan noah wrote: >> in order to get the kodak i40 (clone of av-220?) working with the avision >> backend, i had to extend the TUR/INQ timeouts in the function >> avision_cmd() from 1500 to 2000. otherwise, the scanner gets hung in >> wait_ready(), eventually timing out after 10*30 sec. >> >> my system is A64 4000+, 1gig, FC4 64, with a very short usb cable, so >> maybe i outrun the scanner a bit :) current sane cvs, btw. >> >> rene? > > Yeah, best always CC me as I do need to track soo many lists. > > Thanks for this comment as I never got feedback for the i40. I already have > longer timeouts in my SVN development copy and I'll sync all the tested > changes to SANE CVS in the next days. > > How comes you tinker with so many differnet scanner brands recently?
the same question could be asked of you, since it seems that avision backend works with 9 or 10 'manufacturers' :) i volunteered to make sure this scanner works under SANE, it was not my choice of hardware. i would rather have changeable background color of a nice fujitsu :) i will try to find time to load your SVN copy tonight and run some tests so you can update the status from 'basic'. with current CVS, i have done color/gray/lineart at a few resolutions, but have not tried duplex yet. i expect 'good' is a better choice. visioneer/paperport also appear to sell this scanner too? allan -- "so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know. money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera
