I say use PIXMA_CAP_ADF and PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP and use macros to test. i.e. #define PIXMA_HAS_ADF(x) ((x) & 1<<2) #define PIXMA_HAS_ADFDUP(x) ((x) & (1<<7))
-Dennis ----- Original Message ---- From: nicols <[email protected]> To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:29:39 AM Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Canon imageClass MFP's Or perhaps: PIXMA_CAP_ADF_AND_ADFDUP ... Anyway, let me know if you have any code update to perform. Nicolas Dennis Lou wrote: > > From: nicols <nicolas.martin at freesurf.fr> >>Should we probably change also its name to sthg more explicit, like >>PIXMA_CAP_ADF_OR_ADFDUP ? > > The "OR" seems a little confusing to me, as if the device could be > equipped with one or the other. > >>BTW, did you have also opportunity to test the iclass_finish_scan() >>change proposed for the ?free? issue? > > Not yet. Everything is working fine right now, so I'll probably get to it > during some code cleanup. > > -Dennis > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Canon-imageClass-MFP%27s-tp16736778p16825372.html Sent from the SANE - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
