Hello, OK, I'll try this tonight. What is the best : WITH or WITHOUT SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP ?
Regards Guillaume Selon Pierre Willenbrock <pierre at pirsoft.dnsalias.org>: > Guillaume Gastebois schrieb: > > Hello, > > > > I made two tests today : > > > > test 1 : too bright/too dard = 10/65525 WITH flag : > > SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP. Result can bee found on : > > http://ggastebois.free.fr/lide90_snoop/18_test1.tar > > > > test 2 : too bright/too dard = 10/65525 WITHOUT flag : > > SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP. Result can bee found on : > > http://ggastebois.free.fr/lide90_snoop/18_test2.tar > > > > Not what i expected, although the debug images are looking good. > > Please try to change the first pixel used for minimum calculation to 200 > at about lines 4596 and 4712: > - for (i = 0; i < num_pixels; i++) > + for (i = 150; i < num_pixels; i++) > { > if (dev->model->is_cis) > val = > > > Regards, > Pierre >
