On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > On Tuesday 19 February 2008 12:22:40 Alessandro Zummo wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:59:15 +0100 > > Gerhard Jaeger <gerhard at gjaeger.de> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > in general I have no objections about moving forward, but > > > has the branch in CVS been done? > > > > > > What I'd like to see is at least having the 1.0.x branch > > > for maintainance and proceeding with head for the 1.1.x > > > series (no matter if it is compatible or not). > > > > > > Any comments? > > > > > > right, I forgot it. it's been a while since I last branched > > on a CVS... are you able to do it? > > Think so, but we have to revert then latest changes before branching...
Actually, if you have a tag for the last release, you can easily start a branch from it even if something was committed to the trunk later. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080219/bcddb0db/attachment.pgp
