On Tue, 06 May 2008 18:56:19 +0200 Julien BLACHE <jb at jblache.org> wrote:
> >> I dont know. that is why i originally left it out of 1.1.0, until some > >> upstart came along and forced my hand :) seriously, i think we should > >> leave it undefined for now, and wait until we have some examples. > > > > this is what i defined for sane evolution: > > Eeek. > > Let that be XML, with a proper DTD declaration at the start, and the > frontend will error out if there's no DTD or it doesn't know how to > handle the DTD. > > You're just totally losing the benefit (aheeem.) of XML if you do > anything else. that was the only part with a spec, the whole dtd/document/page model yet has to be defined. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it
