On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:35:56 -0400 "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Also note that we have active OS/2, OS X and Win32 ports, that are > > pretty much guaranteed to break if we start going Linux-only, too. > > > > he never said linux only, he said C99. That should work fine on OSX, > not sure about the other two you mentioned. right. the problem is not C99 itself, is the approach. those are the archs mentioned in sanei/scsi: #define STUBBED_INTERFACE 0 #define LINUX_INTERFACE 1 #define BSD_INTERFACE 2 #define HPUX_INTERFACE 3 #define OPENSTEP_INTERFACE 4 #define DECUNIX_INTERFACE 5 #define SCO_OS5_INTERFACE 6 #define IRIX_INTERFACE 7 #define SOLARIS_INTERFACE 8 #define SOLARIS_SG_INTERFACE 9 #define OS2_INTERFACE 10 #define AIX_GSC_INTERFACE 11 #define DOMAINOS_INTERFACE 12 #define FREEBSD_CAM_INTERFACE 13 #define SYSVR4_INTERFACE 14 #define SCO_UW71_INTERFACE 15 #define SOLARIS_USCSI_INTERFACE 16 #define MACOSX_INTERFACE 17 #define WIN32_INTERFACE 18 I wonder how many users we have for some of those dinosaurs :) -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it
