If you scan with Xsane frontend, there's an integrated color calibration tool using 3 pipettes of white, black and gray:
http://www.xsane.org/doc/sane-xsane-preview-doc.html This gives overall good results, and, with a PIXMA MP610, this color calibration can be done once (calibration settings can be stored in a "medium definition"), and reused for further scans. Pretty easy to use, and efficient. Nicolas Le dimanche 11 mai 2008 ? 15:42 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit : > On 5/11/08, J?rgen Ernst <jrernst at gmx.de> wrote: > > m. allan noah schrieb: > > > > > what scanner did you use that produces such poor calibration? > > > > > ... > > > > > > > >> Have a look at it here: > > >> http://www.ekkehardmorgenstern.de/scancorrect-0.1.tar.gz > > > > > > Unzipping his files gives a readme.txt and there you can find: > > Mustek BearPaw 1200F > > > > I read the file before it posted, but i did not see the scanner until > now. thanks! > > Ekkehard- another choice might be to do this sort of calibration > inside the driver in sane, but that would require becoming familiar > with the code of the sane backend which drives the scanner.... > > allan > -- > "The truth is an offense, but not a sin" >
