it would seem that a better long-term choice would be to correct scanimage to output a \n after each scanner?
allan On 5/25/08, Dieter Jurzitza <dieter.jurzitza at t-online.de> wrote: > Dear Abel, dear Listmembers, > thanks very much, this did the trick! I would never have thought about doing > it this way, though ;-) > > Take care > > > > Dieter Jurzitza > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > | > \ > /\_/\ | > | ~x~ |/-----\ / > \ /- \_/ > ^^__ _ / _ ____ / > <??__ \- \_/ | |/ | | > || || _| _| _| _| > > if you really want to see the pictures above - use some font > with constant spacing like courier! :-) > > -----------------------------------------------------------Am Sonntag, 25. Mai > 2008 02:00:23 schrieb abel deuring: > > > On 23.05.2008 20:45, Dieter Jurzitza wrote: > > > Dear listmembers, > > > having two scanners attached to my system I get calling scanimage -L > > ********** > > > Simply write something like > > > > scanimage -f "%i %d > > " > > ********* > > > -- > sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" > to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org > -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
