On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:24 PM, m. allan noah <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Jose Guadalupe Osuna Chavez > <jose.chaves at sat.gob.mx> wrote: >> >> Another weird thing about bit depth is as a result of the >> read_imageheader command I get values of: 2400 width, 2176 length with a >> total image bytes of 7833600. That doesn't match with an image of 2400 x >> 2176 x 6 bytes per pixel. > > sounds like it is compressed. i think the 48 bit value is a red > herring. the i1860 requires something like 96 bits in that spot, even > though it only scans in 24 bit color.
is that only 1.5 bytes per pixel? i suppose the output could be something like 8bits of Y with 2 bits each for Cb and Cr? that seems like too little data to be useful. do you have the image that the kodak software produced? allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
