Olaf Meeuwissen <olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp> wrote: Hi,
>> 2. Release this as sane 2.0. > > If there were few other changes besides those for the 1.1 stuff, a > soversion bump is probably the best way to move forward. However, > considering the scope of the changes, 2.0 feels a little like an > overstatement and we could consider some extra, non-controversial!, > API-breaking changes. Are there any ;-) Also note that the soname bears no relation to the SANE standard version, and should not. SANE standard version can be part of the library name, ie libsane-2.so.1 would be SANE 2.0. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> <jb at jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
