Jeff Kowalczyk wrote: > Is there any interest in migrating SANE's CVS to a newer revision control > system? > > Subversion would be an improvement for its repository-wide revision > numbers. > > A DVCS such as git would be even more interesting, given the apparent > number of people who could contribute code and/or scanner test data. > > I became interested in this when planning to make a CVS snapshot package > to use some of our scanner hardware. I realized I didn't know offhand how > to refer to a particular revision of the whole tree with CVS. > > With DVCS, maintainers could pull from anyone's repository which > contains useful changesets, and perhaps the newer RCS systems' > export features would make incremental releases easier. >
It's not that we have too many people contributing code to coordinate. Additionally I find git overly cryptic to be help me to actually think of coding, from the distributed systems I prefer Mercurial (hg) most. So my votes are svn or hg. -- Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
