Dieter Jurzitza <dieter.jurzitza at t-online.de> wrote: Hi,
> The missing support for scsi-scanners generically promoting themselves > as "scanners" is intentional. _THIS_ one should really go into the > hal-package, it shouldn't settle within sane because - well, if you know it > is a scanner, it's a scanner and hal ought to know what to do about it. No > job for sane here. The question was about sane-desc, actually. When parsing the desc files, it seems it doesn't care about SCSI scanners not declared as processors. That was the question :) As for the HAL support, I fully concur with the above. > In contrast, players that hide their devices behind strange > names "processor" - this could be a dryer, a washing machine as well, isn't I think there are historical reasons for the processor vs. scanner device type :) > So, here we go. I did a little more fine-tuning with regard to the printout > of > the hal-entries and will end up with a patch based on today's dayly snapshot > when I'll be done. OK. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> <jb at jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
