On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Ilia Sotnikov <hostcc at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:51 PM, m. allan noah <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yes- I had forgotten about that. So now we have dll, net, and fujitsu >> backends, and scanimage natively building? >> > > Not with 'fujitsu' backend in the version I've mentioned, however, as > Michael got the success with it, would be easy to merge the efforts. > I've also made the Xsane port to Win32 (0.991 to be precise), which > was never been published due to absense of any SCM repository. This > pair (SANE backends Win32 + Xsane Win32) I've mentioned when speaking > about what we are using.
Understood. How complex do you feel your changes were to get the sane-backends side working? Reasonable to #ifdef into mainline? allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
