On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 2:20 AM, Jeffrey Ratcliffe <jeffrey.ratcliffe at gmail.com> wrote: > 2008/12/10 m. allan noah <kitno455 at gmail.com>: >> No, they are not floats, they are fixed. It is possible to manipulate >> them without UNFIXing them. The fujitsu backend has produced these >> type of warnings for years, even on simple things like >> --resolution=100, and I never could figure out why, until now... > > Of course, you are right that they are fixed - I should have expressed > myself more precisely - and whilst it may be possible to manipulate > them without unfixing them, I don't see why the -1 is necessary: > > val = pos + window_val[index] - 1 > >> If your patch fixed the issue, I wonder if it was just a fluke, that >> your *info was 0 on that run? > > It seems unlikely - but... >
yes- i dont quite get the -1, but no matter, because the other code that manipulates this value has +1, so it evens out in the end? can you verify that the version of scanimage that is in sane CVS now fixes the complaining? allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
