On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Johannes Meixner <jsmeix at suse.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > I like to suggest to disable those entries in the > udev rules file which belong to unsupported devices > (at least for devices which are no "usual" scanners).
> For background information see > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439193 > "fingerprint reader gets udev/HAL settings for scanners" > > For the particular device, see > http://www.sane-project.org/cgi-bin/driver.pl?manu=&model=&bus=any&v=08ff&p=2580 > > For me it seems to be wrong to have "known but unsupported" devices > listed in the libsane.rules file because it seems not to make sense > to set owner, group, and permissions for devices which are not > supported by SANE which would even cause conflicts if such a > device is supported by whatever other software. Personally, I would like to see those type of machines dropped from the .desc files, particularly when the linked site says SANE support won't happen, and external progs should be used instead. For a machine that is a true 'scanner', and might be supported with a simple code change, I think it still makes sense to still ship the rules. > If you disable "unsupported" entries in the udev rules file > note that there can be a "unsupported" entry for one backend > for a model which is actually supported by another backend, see > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439193#c6 Ah, good point. In this case, I think it makes sense to remove those devices from the backends that don't support them. We dont leave machines in unsupported.desc once they get supported... If I dont hear any complaints, I'll make these changes later this week... allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
