unsubscribe 2009/2/18 <sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> Send sane-devel mailing list submissions to > sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > sane-devel-owner at lists.alioth.debian.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of sane-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Document scanner, hardware recommendations. (Johannes Groedem) > 2. Re: Document scanner, hardware recommendations. (m. allan noah) > 3. Re: Document scanner, hardware recommendations. (Johannes Groedem) > 4. Re: Document scanner, hardware recommendations. (m. allan noah) > 5. Re: Document scanner, hardware recommendations. (Johannes Groedem) > 6. Re: Document scanner, hardware recommendations. (m. allan noah) > 7. Re: HP Scanjet G2710 support in RPM-packed sane-backends > (Jacek Ru?yczka) > 8. Re: HP Scanjet G2710 support in RPM-packed sane-backends > (Johannes Meixner) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:33:09 +0100 > From: Johannes Groedem <johs at netfonds.no> > Subject: [sane-devel] Document scanner, hardware recommendations. > To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > Message-ID: <krk57pm3ay.fsf at bubbles.netfonds.no> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > I was wondering if anyone has any recommendations for SANE-supported > scanners with a document-feeder and decent scanning-speed that doesn't > jam a lot, etc. It needs to be able to scan A4 documents in a few > seconds per page (300 DPI color is fine). Our current scanner takes > 20-30 seconds per color page, and is not well supported by SANE. > > Doesn't necessarily have to be cheap. We just want something that > works. Our previous scanner (an HP) cost $1500-ish, which one might > think would be enough for a half-decent scanner, but apparently it > isn't. > > Pointers would be greatly appreciated. > > -- > Johannes Gr?dem > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:54:51 -0500 > From: "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Document scanner, hardware recommendations. > To: Johannes Groedem <johs at netfonds.no> > Cc: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > Message-ID: > <97246d0e0902170854q68f30ca2ob1c7e4811d2f40f4 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I am very, very happy with the Fujitsu fi-6130. Fast, quiet, small, > reversed roller system prevents jams, very well supported in SANE CVS > version. Not cheap, but less than your HP :) If your needs are a > little less, you might be able to find the previous model (fi-5120C) > around on clearance or refurbished. It's not as good as the 6130, but > still a nice machine. Others like the Avision AV220 (which is also > available under other brand names: Kodak, Visioneer, etc), but I've > only used one of those briefly. You might try searching the mailing > list... > > allan > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Johannes Groedem <johs at netfonds.no> > wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone has any recommendations for SANE-supported > > scanners with a document-feeder and decent scanning-speed that doesn't > > jam a lot, etc. It needs to be able to scan A4 documents in a few > > seconds per page (300 DPI color is fine). Our current scanner takes > > 20-30 seconds per color page, and is not well supported by SANE. > > > > Doesn't necessarily have to be cheap. We just want something that > > works. Our previous scanner (an HP) cost $1500-ish, which one might > > think would be enough for a half-decent scanner, but apparently it > > isn't. > > > > Pointers would be greatly appreciated. > > > > -- > > Johannes Gr?dem > > > > > > -- > > sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" > > to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org > > > > > > -- > "The truth is an offense, but not a sin" > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:05:36 +0100 > From: Johannes Groedem <johs at netfonds.no> > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Document scanner, hardware recommendations. > To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > Message-ID: <kr1vtxkn8f.fsf at bubbles.netfonds.no> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > * "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com>: > > I am very, very happy with the Fujitsu fi-6130. Fast, quiet, small, > > reversed roller system prevents jams, very well supported in SANE CVS > > version. Not cheap, but less than your HP :) If your needs are a > > little less, you might be able to find the previous model (fi-5120C) > > around on clearance or refurbished. It's not as good as the 6130, but > > still a nice machine. Others like the Avision AV220 (which is also > > available under other brand names: Kodak, Visioneer, etc), but I've > > only used one of those briefly. You might try searching the mailing > > list... > > Thank you for your swift answer. I forgot to mention that I need a > combined document feeder/flatbed-scanner, though, so that particular > model won't work, regrettably. Can I ask how many seconds it takes, > approximately, to scan a color page? (Manufacturers have an annoying > tendency to only specify some kind of theoretical max PPM instead of > expected average PPM at some reasonable setting.) > > -- > Johannes Gr?dem > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:27:46 -0500 > From: "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Document scanner, hardware recommendations. > To: Johannes Groedem <johs at netfonds.no> > Cc: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > Message-ID: > <97246d0e0902170927o1b67502atfc0939e7bb5438f5 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Johannes Groedem <johs at netfonds.no> > wrote: > > * "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com>: > >> I am very, very happy with the Fujitsu fi-6130. Fast, quiet, small, > >> reversed roller system prevents jams, very well supported in SANE CVS > >> version. Not cheap, but less than your HP :) If your needs are a > >> little less, you might be able to find the previous model (fi-5120C) > >> around on clearance or refurbished. It's not as good as the 6130, but > >> still a nice machine. Others like the Avision AV220 (which is also > >> available under other brand names: Kodak, Visioneer, etc), but I've > >> only used one of those briefly. You might try searching the mailing > >> list... > > > > Thank you for your swift answer. I forgot to mention that I need a > > combined document feeder/flatbed-scanner, though, so that particular > > model won't work, regrettably. Can I ask how many seconds it takes, > > approximately, to scan a color page? (Manufacturers have an annoying > > tendency to only specify some kind of theoretical max PPM instead of > > expected average PPM at some reasonable setting.) > > So how about the fi-6230 :) > > > http://www.fujitsu.com/global/services/computing/peripheral/scanners/product/fi6230/ > > It performs as advertised- 30ppm color at 300dpi. > > allan > -- > "The truth is an offense, but not a sin" > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:30:59 +0100 > From: Johannes Groedem <johs at netfonds.no> > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Document scanner, hardware recommendations. > To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > Message-ID: <kriqn9j7ho.fsf at bubbles.netfonds.no> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > * "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com>: > >> Thank you for your swift answer. I forgot to mention that I need a > >> combined document feeder/flatbed-scanner, though, so that particular > >> model won't work, regrettably. Can I ask how many seconds it takes, > >> approximately, to scan a color page? (Manufacturers have an annoying > >> tendency to only specify some kind of theoretical max PPM instead of > >> expected average PPM at some reasonable setting.) > > > > So how about the fi-6230 :) > > > > > http://www.fujitsu.com/global/services/computing/peripheral/scanners/product/fi6230/ > > > > It performs as advertised- 30ppm color at 300dpi. > > This one looks very nice, and the SANE compatibility list says > "complete" as well. Thanks again. > > -- > Johannes Gr?dem > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:33:46 -0500 > From: "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Document scanner, hardware recommendations. > To: Johannes Groedem <johs at netfonds.no> > Cc: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > Message-ID: > <97246d0e0902170933o349b90e6qf92ea8dbcac7727 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Johannes Groedem <johs at netfonds.no> > wrote: > > * "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com>: > >>> Thank you for your swift answer. I forgot to mention that I need a > >>> combined document feeder/flatbed-scanner, though, so that particular > >>> model won't work, regrettably. Can I ask how many seconds it takes, > >>> approximately, to scan a color page? (Manufacturers have an annoying > >>> tendency to only specify some kind of theoretical max PPM instead of > >>> expected average PPM at some reasonable setting.) > >> > >> So how about the fi-6230 :) > >> > >> > http://www.fujitsu.com/global/services/computing/peripheral/scanners/product/fi6230/ > >> > >> It performs as advertised- 30ppm color at 300dpi. > > > > This one looks very nice, and the SANE compatibility list says > > "complete" as well. Thanks again. > > sure- just make sure you are running the SANE CVS version, not 1.0.19. > And you might want to wait and see if anyone else has a less expensive > suggestion :) > > allan > -- > "The truth is an offense, but not a sin" > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:22:42 +0100 > From: Jacek Ru?yczka <stacheldraht at interia.pl> > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] HP Scanjet G2710 support in RPM-packed > sane-backends > To: "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com>, > sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > Message-ID: <200902172022.42522.stacheldraht at interia.pl> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" > > Am Tuesday 17 February 2009 20:17:08 schrieben Sie: > > what arguments did you give to configure when you built sane? > > > > allan > > > I didn't compile it myself, I used the following RPMs: > > jacek at veteran:~> rpm -qa | grep sane > sane-backends-32bit-1.0.19-99.1 > sane-backends-autoconfig-1.0.19-99.1 > sane-frontends-1.0.14-302.35 > sane-backends-1.0.19-128.106 > > Jacek > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Promocja w Speak Up. Kurs angielskiego za darmo. > Liczba miejsc ograniczona. Sprawd?!>> http://link.interia.pl/f205c > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:44:51 +0100 (CET) > From: Johannes Meixner <jsmeix at suse.de> > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] HP Scanjet G2710 support in RPM-packed > sane-backends > To: Jacek Ru?yczka <stacheldraht at interia.pl> > Cc: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0902181037300.14462 at nelson.suse.de> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > > Hello, > > On Feb 17 20:22 Jacek Ru?yczka wrote (shortened): > > I didn't compile it myself, I used the following RPMs: > > > > jacek at veteran:~> rpm -qa | grep sane > > sane-backends-32bit-1.0.19-99.1 > > sane-backends-autoconfig-1.0.19-99.1 > > sane-frontends-1.0.14-302.35 > > sane-backends-1.0.19-128.106 > > See > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475266#c1 > > > By the way, only for your information regarding > our sane-backends-autoconfig package: > ------------------------------------------------------------ > user at host$ rpm -qi sane-backends-autoconfig > ... > USB scanner autoconfiguration happens via udev. > The file /etc/udev/rules.d/56-sane-backends-autoconfig.rules > contains entries for those USB scanners where the USB IDs > are known, which are supported by a free driver, > where the support status is "complete" or "good", > and which do not require firmware upload. > ... > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Kind Regards > Johannes Meixner > -- > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany > AG Nuernberg, HRB 16746, GF: Markus Rex > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > sane-devel mailing list > sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > > End of sane-devel Digest, Vol 44, Issue 46 > ****************************************** > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20090219/ada0c559/attachment-0001.htm
