On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Alessandro Zummo <azummo-lists at towertech.it> wrote: > On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:04:41 -0400 > "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> The first two are mine, but the others need some checking by the >> authors to make sure that all the required changes have been made. >> Particularly coolscan3, which might need to have it's infrared option >> disabled, and xerox_mfp which might need to handle the warming up >> status? > > ?Hi, disabled because RGBI is not yet supposed to be supported, right?
Correct. We will re-open the discussion of the API changes after we get 1.0.20 out the door. I suppose you could still send the RGBI data, and tell the front-end that it gets more bytes per line than expected. But that will make most front-ends choke, so it is a poor workaround. allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
