On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:53 PM, stef<stef.dev at free.fr> wrote: > Le lundi 8 juin 2009 21:40:05 Julien BLACHE, vous avez ?crit : >> "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> My fingers slipped on the keyboard, so if you get an empty mail before >> this one... sorry. >> >> >> My take on this is that it should be handled out of band and by the >> >> frontend only. The frontend should have all the information needed to >> >> determine which ICC profile applies. >> > >> > I agree. But in the case of saned, this means each client would need >> > the ICC profile for the scanner installed locally, or some other >> > protocol would have to be used to call the server for it. >> >> As I wrote already, saned is not for scanning over the Internet on a >> random scanner thousands of miles away. If you're scanning over the >> network, you're scanning over YOUR network, which means YOUR Oyranos >> server is accessible the same way the saned host is accessible at the >> time the scan is done. I don't see a problem here, really. >> >> Worst case the frontend can generate the ICC profile identification >> and you can retrieve it later on with that. >> >> JB. > > ? ? ? ?Hello, > > ? ? ? ?if it wasn't for the API, wouldn't be the backend the best place to > know > about a scanning device ICC profile ?
That depends- just what is IN one of these profiles? How is it generated? allan -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
