On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:55:23 +0200 Julien BLACHE <jb at jblache.org> wrote:
> > my vote is for the 4th option. > > And here I was, thinking you people wanted to see some progress made. > > You do realize that option 4 basically guarantees that pretty much > nothing major will happen, will drag on for years and basically be > a pain to manage because there will be lot of small changes all the > time? as long as the api change is documented and not mandatory it's perfectly viable. You know, I made a test bed with sane-evolution for this and worked flawlessy, even retaining frontend compatibility. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it
