On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:58:03 -0400 "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > If we have decided to break for sane 2, it might be worthwhile > > to do that in such a way to avoid troubles in the future. > > > but this does not avoid troubles, it just pushes them out to the front-end > developer, forcing him to have multiple branches in his code to deal with > all the variations. I would much prefer to have the major number of the > backend be a contract with the front-end author. If that means we have to > leave some unmaintained backends behind, so be it. So you force it to either switch or to maintain two trees. Oh well, I do not agree, but.. so be it. I'd love to have the media type anyway ;) -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it
