Hi Alessandro, Am Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2010 schrieb Alessandro Zummo: > On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:30:23 +0100 > > Rainer Dorsch <rdorsch at web.de> wrote: > > Did you forget to add a new patch or do you think the old one compensates > > already for the 8 lines? > > The backend does some compensation, but a few lines are lost > anyhow. Yoo might try to understand how the algorithm works > and compensate more ;)
I will live with the few missing lines :-) I might come back, if I have more time though ;-) I tried yesterday the color scan with 150 dpi, imagemagick accepted the file and it look visually ok. I also did a color scan with 300 dpi, imagemagick accepted this file (as it did before the patch). I did not do a visual inspection of that scan. Right now I have only remote access on the machine and a slow upload line. I will can do more tests on the weekend. Is there something you would consider of high value? Varying resolutions? Varying color, grayscale, and binary? Others? Do you want to see the debug output? If yes, debug level 18? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch L?rchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdorsch at web.de jabber: rdorsch at jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100108/77c091f6/attachment.pgp>
