> maybe we can agree on an field in the .desc, like > > protocols: escp2, escp2-net, proprietary
I don't really think this is necessary. The comments in epkowa.desc regarding the network plugin and the interpreter plugins can already be uniquely identified and we do keep the strings consistent. I was just pointing out that you need to be careful about the search terms your script uses to identify interpreter models so that you don't exclude models that use the (entirely optional) network plugin. Happy scanning, -- Alesh Slovak Linux Team -- AVASYS Corporation alesh.slovak at avasys.jp http://avasys.jp
