More information please- which version of sane-backends (aka libsane) are you running on these two machines? The version of ubuntu is useless to us.
Also- is one of the machines 64 bit and the other 32bit? allan On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:44 AM, walla at tiscali.it <walla at tiscali.it> wrote: > Hi, > > I subscribe this mailing list because I'm not able to solve a problem with > sane vs. lucid (10.04LTS). > > I have a Flat scan usb 19200 (Trust) and it doesn't work under lucid, I > followed the instructions, copy its firmware in the right path and > configured gt68xx.conf using Artec Ultima 2000 as shown in the instructions. > > usb 0x05d8 0x4002 > # Artec Ultima 2000: > override "artec-ultima-2000" > firmware "PS1fw.usb" > > When I try to launch Xsane from prompt line it seems there is a > calibration's problem of the scanner (I think!): > > [gt68xx] gt68xx_afe_cis_auto: setting exposure reached limit > > The result of the acquisition is a black screen! > > If I perform the same steps of the instructions on Karmic 9.10 the scanner > works fine!...so I understood well the procedure to install scanner! > > A difference between lucid and karmic when I start Xsane: > > 1) on Karmic Xsane recognize scanner as Artec 2000 > 2) on Lucid Xsane recognize scanner as Bear Paw 1200 (it's default setting > if you don't use override but I perform override in gt68xx.conf as shown > before) > > Other settings of Xsane: > > backend 1.0.20 > deep 8 bit > > Thank you very much in advance for your support! > > Walla > > -- > sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" > ? ? ? ? ? ? to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org > -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
