hello I tried to install "sane-utils 1.0.21" as *.deb (because of the version number) instead of "sane 1.0.14-9" as I found in the "synaptic": package adress:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/natty/i386/sane-utils/1.0.21-9ubuntu1 without success (no progress in installing for 1/2 h +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ here my results from this morning: Ubuntu 10.10 Kernel 2.6.38-8 Ubuntu 11.04 Kernel 2.6.35 SuSE 11.3 Kernel 2.6.34-12 SuSE 11.4 Kernel 2.6.37-0,5 Printer/Scanner Lexmark X1270 (2 different printers) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Problem: does not scan at 150 dpi, 150 dpi-pictures not valid, scan breaks down at 1/2 with noise ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Trials: 2 different Lex X1270; all Linux as above; all utilities as below; Package relationships xsane .997 Package relationships xsane .998 Depends on: Depends on: libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.29.3) installed libc6 (>= 2.7) libc6 (>= 2.7) libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4) installed libfontconfig1 (>= 2.8.0) installed libfreetype6 (>= 2.2.1) installed libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.21.6) installed libgimp2.0 (>= 2.4.0) libgimp2.0 (>= 2.4.0) libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0) libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0) libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.14.0) libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.14.0) libjpeg62 libjpeg62 (>= 6b1) liblcms1 (>= 1.15-1) liblcms1 (>= 1.15-1) libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.14.0) libpango1.0-0 (1.28.4) libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.13-4) libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.13-4) libsane (>= 1.0.11-3) libsane (>= 1.0.11-3) libtiff4 libtiff4 xsane-common (= 0.997-2ubuntu3) xsane-common (= 0.998-1ubuntu1) zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) Suggests: both gimp gocr gv hylafax-client Recommends: both cups-client firefox RESULTS FOR >> Lexmark X1270* << ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Scanutility/dpi |xsane .998 |xsane .997 |skanlite |simplescan |75 150 300** |75 150 300** |75 150 300** | 300** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ u 10.10 |-- -- -- |ok ok ok |ok ok ok | ok u 11.04 |ok *NOT* ok |ok *NOT* ok |ok *NOT* ok | ok ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ s 11.3 |-- -- -- |ok ok ok |ok ok ok | ok s 11.4 |ok *NOT* ok | not tested |ok *NOT* ok | ok ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ** 300 dpi runs "interlaced" ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ * may be similar with Lexmark X11**, lexmark X12** * Downgrading xsane .998 to xsane .997 on ubuntu 11.4 with *NO POSITIVE* result * scan.logs are all different and big (~ 14000 lines) * The "connection" between - "u 11.04", "s 11,4" and - xsane .997, xsane .998, skanlite has changed, maybe caused by different memory management between xsane / scanlite and Linux regards gerrit Am 13.05.2011 21:07, schrieb stef: > Le vendredi 13 mai 2011 20:25:50 Gerrit Borgers, vous avez ?crit : >> The result for today: *No difference* between *xsane .998* and *xsane >> .997* and *skanlite* on ubuntu *11.04* both *not* working korrectly on >> *150 dpi*. >> >> ???? Maybe it's a problem with (ubuntu 11.04-) Memory-Management ???? >> >> regards >> Gerrit > Hello, > > there is a possibility this a regression in the lexmark backend. Try to > downgrade to SANE 1.0.21. > > Regards, > Stef -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20110514/906dbd32/attachment-0001.htm>
