i think the sniffer does not run on win7 also, i do not need all the higher resolutions.
allan On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Furio Settimi <ris at bresciaservice.com> wrote: > We have build a test PC station with Windows 7 Home premium 64bit only for > test the scanner Canon DR-7550C. > PC config: > AMD Athlon II 170u 2.00GHz with 3.00 GB Ram. > Software in use: Canon Capture Perfect 3.0. > > We will can begin the testing with this setting: > Black & White - A4 - 100 dpi - single side > Black & White - A4 - 150 dpi - single side > Black & White - A4 - 200 dpi - single side > Black & White - A4 - 300 dpi - single side > Black & White - A4 - 400 dpi - single side > Black & White - A4 - 600 dpi - single side > Black & White - A4 - 100 dpi - double side > Error diffusion - A4 - 100 dpi - single side > Advanced text - A4 - 100 dpi - single side > Advanced text II - A4 - 100 dpi - single side > 256 color gray scale - A4 - 100 dpi - single side > Color 24bit - A4 - 300 dpi - single side > Black & White - Letter - 100 dpi - single side > > > Thanks > Furio & Fabio > > > Il 01/12/2011 01:33, m. allan noah ha scritto: > >> This machine uses a new command 'e5' instead of the traditional 'd5' >> command used by older canon dr machines. The contents of these >> commands are unknown. So, I need you to make some more logs in >> windows. You will need to change one setting, make a scan, save the >> log, clear the log, and change the setting back to the previous value. >> This way, we can determine the differences. >> >> If you could start by making a scan identical to your last, but >> simplex instead, that would be a good starting point. >> >> After that, we would need simplex scans with the various special >> features changed. Things like dropout color, or multi-feed detection, >> asynchronous mode, etc. >> >> I know this is a great deal of work, but lacking documentation, there >> is no other way. >> >> allan >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:48 AM, m. allan noah<kitno455 at gmail.com> >> ?wrote: >>> >>> Thank you. I will look at it tonight. >>> >>> allan >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Furio Settimi<ris at bresciaservice.com> >>> ?wrote: >>>> >>>> I am slowly because have only one pc with microsoft >>>> sorry >>>> >>>> Furio >>>> >>>> >>>> Il 30/11/2011 02:22, m. allan noah ha scritto: >>>> >>>>> Can you make a log of the scanner actually making a scan? Maybe low >>>>> resolution binary duplex? >>>>> >>>>> allan >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Furio Settimi<ris at bresciaservice.com> >>>>> ?wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Il 25/11/2011 17:16, m. allan noah ha scritto: >>>>>> >>>>>>> This machine is untested. Apparently it does not like the buffering >>>>>>> command. This command might be unsupported, or it might have a >>>>>>> different format for this machine. Can you get a log of the scanner >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> action under windows, using this software: >>>>>>> http://www.pcausa.com/Utilities/UsbSnoop/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> for this, send attachment >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> If not, we can just disable this command, and rebuild sane-backends >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> source. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> for this, how I can make it ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Furio >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin" >> >> >> >> > -- "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
