Hi again,
since there has been no response as yet, I just wanted to find out
whether this message has actually been noticed.
Also, I'd like to know if I can do anything to ensure that patch
reviewal will take place eventually. It would be a shame if plustek
users had to do without scanimage --batch-prompt and the like for too
much longer.
If, on the other hand, you are aware of my request, I apologise for the
noise and ask you not to feel pushed impatiently.
Looking forward to your comments,
Elias
(2012-03-08) Elias Oltmanns <eo at nebensachen.de> wrote:
> Hi there,
> would you mind merging the attached patch (or something similar in
> spirit)? The idea is to make batch operation working with teh plustek
> driver.
>
> Thanks in advance for your cooperation,
>
> Elias
>
> From: Elias Oltmanns <eo at nebensachen.de>
> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:53:05 +0100
> Subject: plustek: Flag device as unbusy on completion of data transfer
>
> Batch operation has been broken resulting in a "device busy" error
> message when trying to scan teh second page.
> ---
> backend/plustek.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/backend/plustek.c b/backend/plustek.c
> index f3b37e1..02a6b4f 100644
> --- a/backend/plustek.c
> +++ b/backend/plustek.c
> @@ -2706,6 +2706,7 @@ sane_read( SANE_Handle handle, SANE_Byte *data,
> (unsigned long)(s->params.lines *
> s->params.bytes_per_line)) {
> sanei_thread_waitpid( s->reader_pid, 0 );
> reader_pid = -1;
> + s->scanning = SANE_FALSE;
> drvclose( s->hw );
> return close_pipe(s);
> }
> @@ -2734,6 +2735,7 @@ sane_read( SANE_Handle handle, SANE_Byte *data,
> return s->exit_code;
> }
> reader_pid = -1;
> + s->scanning = SANE_FALSE;
> return close_pipe(s);
> }
> return SANE_STATUS_GOOD;
