On 2012-06-21 23:07, Paul Newall wrote: > kodakaio was based on magicolor. I have made the minimum changes to > get it to work. That's why so many references to magicolor remain. I'm > not sure what the right approach is? If I have a function that is > identical to the function in magicolor, it might be good for it to > have the same name? > I guess if I have changed a function, it ought to have a new name. > The kodakaio scanners have nothing significant in common with the > magicolor scanners.
When I wrote the magicolor backend, I took the epson2 backend and did a huge search-and-replace to get rid of everything epson-specific and instead use magicolor-specific names (e.g. *_mc_* etc.) Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinhold at kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial& Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
