El 22/10/2012 19:22, "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> escribi?: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 7:55 PM, dabicho <tsukebumi at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > El 22/10/2012 18:44, "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> escribi?: > > > > > >> > >> That is the backend's indication that it does not know the length of > >> the paper. The backend should have some option where you set the > >> height of the image you want it to scan. If you do not tell it, it > >> tells you that it does not know. I imagine you use an Avision scanner? > >> > >> allan > >> > > Yes. It is avision. > > Funny thing is it used to work with previous release (21). I set a high br-y > > value. 22000000. Could that be the problem? How can I calculate it for the > > whole area? > > > > Thank you. > > We have another report to this effect for the Avision backend. The -1 > value is valid, but a little unusual if you have specifically > requested a valid br-y. If so, I would expect the backend either > truncate or pad the image as required. Is 22000000 really valid? >
I came to that value by trial and error previously (21), so I assumed it was valid as it worked. I think I was wrong and the previous backend was more permissive. I will go the other route. Thank you. > > allan > -- > "The truth is an offense, but not a sin" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20121022/1f57656f/attachment-0001.html>
