2013/8/22 Wilhelm <wilhelm.meier at fh-kl.de> > Am 21.08.2013 23:27, schrieb Sander Devrieze: > >> 2013/8/21 Wilhelm <wilhelm.meier at fh-kl.de <mailto:wilhelm.meier at >> fh-kl.de* >> *>> >> >> Am 21.08.2013 16:04, schrieb Sander Devrieze: >> >> 2013/8/21 Wilhelm <wilhelm.meier at fh-kl.de >> <mailto:wilhelm.meier at fh-kl.de**> <mailto:wilhelm.meier at >> fh-kl.de >> >> <mailto:wilhelm.meier at fh-kl.de**>> >> >> >> <snip> >> >> Mmh, looks good. >> >> So, if scanimage finds the scanner (started with the uid/gid as in >> scanbd.conf), scanbd should find it too, if started as root and the >> env-var SANE_CONFIG_DIR set. >> >> >> Scanimage does not find the scanner right now. It did only find the >> scanner when not using the net backend os sane. >> > > That's ok. For a desktop machine using scanbd and local scanning apps > (like scanimage), scanbd / scanbm must be running. Please read 0.1) > solution from the README.txt: scanbm acts as a proxy for saned. > > > In that case, the >> genesys backend was immediately chosen. What else can I try? >> > > The below log shows, that scanbd recognizes the scanner and his options. > So now you have to figure out which buttons correlate to which option value > changes: just press a button and watch the log. Then you can tweak the > scripts for the button actions.
This is the current status: 1) saned not running + scanbd not running + scanimage -L --> scanner found 2) saned not running + scanbd running + manually running scanbm --> the logs show scanbd is interrupted for a short moment 3) saned not running + scanbd running + scanimage -L --> scanner *not* found Why is case #3 not working? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20130822/42a51c95/attachment-0001.html>
