On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Simon Matter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The key point here, and the reason I asked for these logs initially, > > was your ability to scan properly with vuescan, and not with sane. My > > hope was that you could make the absolute smallest scan with identical > > parameters in both programs, so we could compare. If things are > > working better now, that will be difficult. > > Why not revert to the older kernel and see if the problem comes back? > Would be nice to confirm that the kernel makes the difference here. > > Simon > > The fail logs from the past couple of days were all with the newest kernel. So the problem remains with the current kernel and it was only on one occasion that by chance the scanner completed a scan and that just happened to be with the new kernel soon after it was installed. I suspect that repeated attempts with the previous kernel would not have made much difference. -- mike c
-- sane-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" to [email protected]
