On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 07:54:51PM +0300, I wrote: > > > The MF6100 series is not listed, but it again might be quite > > > possible to get it to work. > > The same almost white image as with 8540: > > http://fly.osdn.org.ua/~mike/tmp/sane-pixma/Canon-MF6140dn-scanimage.ppm.xz > > Silly me, it wasn't "almost white" but rather a valid scan of > the scanner's background! Managed not to check the actual page > is in place, sorry for being *that* stupid that day... > > Retested as of RELEASE_1_0_24-296-g0655b05 and these are the
FIX: the packages built were RELEASE_1_0_24-292-g8c51579, updating to RELEASE_1_0_24-296-g0655b05 now. This matters. > results with a USB2-connected crop of Canon devices: > > MF8540Cdn: scanimage OK, xsane OK (75/150/300/600, colour/bw) > (at least "Good" by me) > > MF6140dn and iR1133if: scanimage/xsane OK _BUT_ only once, sort of > (might be "Basic", don't know if this passes for git) > > Now there's a problem with 6140 and 1133 that looks like this: > > - scanimage produces a file (which is fine); > - second scanimage in a row hangs; > - xsane hangs too when trying to preview/scan; > - turning "remote scan" off and on is not enough; > - turning the device off and on (with subsequent > selection of scan mode plus "remote scan") helps; > - scanimage would hang the same after xsane; > - several consecutive scans using a running xsane > instance are OK (e.g., different density). > > 6140 also exhibited weird behaviour at 600dpi (the sound's also > different from 75/150/300 which scanned just fine): the head > might have been hitting the edge for a second or two with the > result being gray bands along the scanning direction at the end > of the file, I've uploaded a (8Kx5K) sample here just in case: > http://fly.osdn.org.ua/~mike/tmp/sane-pixma/Canon-MF6140dn-xsane-600dpi.jpeg > > 1133 didn't hit that (the 600dpi sound is also different) but the > image quality suffers from some kind of a "cellular" effect, see > http://fly.osdn.org.ua/~mike/tmp/sane-pixma/Canon-iR1133iF-xsane-600dpi.jpeg > (300dpi and lower are fine though). > > Again, 8500 had neither of these problems for me now -- > never got stuck whatever scanimage/xsane/scanimage I did, > the image wasn't distorted, the head didn't hit anything. > At least so far. :) > > Thank you! -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin / http://altlinux.org ------ http://opennet.ru / http://anna-news.info -- sane-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" to [email protected]
