Send sanog mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sanog.org/mailman/listinfo/sanog
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of sanog digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Telecom requirements for local Internet access in India
and US based Citrix solutions (Stefan)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:57:03 -0600
From: Stefan <[email protected]>
To: DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [SANOG] Telecom requirements for local Internet access in
India and US based Citrix solutions
Message-ID:
<cack08n_tc70u88mfyk+mgejpbvwjqwrhw2cnkf6ux2pojld...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Thank you for this, Durga! This would be great news.I would highly
appreciate any more feedback on this, should you be able to obtain such.
***Stefan
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:13 AM, DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I am not aware of any rule that mandates the need to provide local
> internet access if the company policy doesn?t allow that. I have lot of
> customers who provide no internet access at all.
>
> If the senior managers do need internet, they can use their laptops to
> browse by minimising the RDP screen. (at least that is what they do when
> the remote US side does not allow them to browse through the tunnel using
> the remote US gateways).
>
> Also - I am not aware of any rule that mandates that Indian browsing
> should happen only through Indian gateways. I will find out once more since
> I might have missed it.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Durga Prasad
>
> +919849111010
>
>
>
> *From:* Stefan [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* 10 February 2015 22:17
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [SANOG] Telecom requirements for local Internet access in
> India and US based Citrix solutions
>
>
>
> I am not sure how else to explain. I was referenced to the Indian
> Telegraph Act 1885, and amendments to such brought forth by the India
> Department of Telecommunications, in time, which, in what I am interested
> in, allegedly require local Internet access for all employees in India.
> This is not possible if using thin clients hosted in US-based DCs, designed
> to access the Internet in the US, unless those specific to India hosted
> virtual desktops being configured to "go back" to India (via some creative
> routing and/or proxy pacs, with proxy servers hosted in India) to comply
> with the alleged requirement. If the latter is true, then the bad
> performance I was alluding to: India employee accessing virtual desktop in
> the US DC, which then sends them back to India for Internet access.
>
>
> ***Stefan
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:50 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello Stefan,
>
> I can help you on the technical advice.
>
> Many of our clients access servers in the US on a continuous basis. You
> get excellent bandwidth and uptime in India, particularly in the cities.
>
> However I did not understand the India-US-india round trip part.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards DP
>
> 9849111010.
>
>
>
> Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity and typos if any.
>
>
>
> -------- Original message 9/02/2015 23:57 (GMT+05:30)
>
> To: [email protected]
>
> Subject: [SANOG] Telecom requirements for local Internet access in India
> and US based Citrix solutions
>
>
>
> Hi, everyone,
>
>
>
> I was wondering if someone could point me (or share direct, personal
> experience) to some information referencing local Internet access (per
> legal requirements for doing business) in India, if in need to utilize
> Citrix or VMWare solutions (virtual desktop) hosted in US-based Data
> Centers, at present with corresponding US Internet access. A redirection of
> such traffic from India -to-> US virtual desktop -to-> India local Internet
> access is definitely a technical possibility, but I assume that due to the
> latency would be practically useless.
>
>
>
> NOTE: due to internal security requirements, the "embedded" browser from
> some versions of thin client is not an option.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> ***Stefan
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.sanog.org/pipermail/sanog/attachments/20150210/d248c81b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
sanog mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sanog.org/mailman/listinfo/sanog
End of sanog Digest, Vol 37, Issue 4
************************************
