I looked at the signatures and md5 checksums for the four artifacts and they look good.

But the artifacts do need to have -incubating in their file names. It's not sufficient to have incubator in the path name since once you download the files they lose their path.

I didn't look inside the artifacts, but trust others will have done so.

So, -1 based on the file names. If these get fixed, +1

Craig

On Jul 22, 2008, at 7:25 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

Great!

I'll try to have a look at the dist today.

Thanks
Carsten

Charles Matthew Chen wrote:
Hello there,
 I've reorganized the proposed 0.93 release of Sanselan following
Craig's suggestions.  Let's put this release to a vote.
 The proposed release can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~cmchen/dist/
 Here's a summary of the reorganization that I've just done:
* I've reorganized the folder structure so that it exactly matches
what would be copied to www.apache.org/dist.
* I've renamed the folders and files to conform with Apache customs.
ie. the I renamed the -project files to -src.  I also removed the
-incubator suffix from the files.
* I've removed the extra checksum files generated by Maven.
* Maven generated both a -bin distribution as well as a plain .jar.
I've removed the plain jar.
* I've removed the bz2-compressed distributions generated by Maven.
  Also, I've attached the RAT output for the bin and src releases.
RAT seems a little wary of the .txt and text-like (ie. .ppm) files in
the source distribution.
  Apache's "A Guide To Release Management During Incubation" (DRAFT)
has a checklist:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
 I believe everything on that checklist is good to go.
For the record, here's a couple more relevant links on release voting:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Charles.


--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to