Hi Jeremias, That makes a lot of sense - thanks for explaining.
Charles. On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A vote, even a release vote, should run for at least 72 hours (given the > Saturday deadline, I think you wanted to write 72 hours) to give > everyone a chance to look into the topic at hand. Even if no vetoes are > possible, someone might still find a critical issue after the first 3 +1 > votes have been collected. If nothing else it's a QA measure. > > http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html > "Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to > provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate > regardless of their geographic locations." > > On 24.07.2008 10:41:57 Charles Matthew Chen wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Great - that makes three +1 votes for the 0.94 release. >> >> """ >> Votes on whether a package is ready to be released follow a format >> similar to majority approval -- except that the decision is >> officially determined solely by whether at least three +1 votes were >> registered. >> """ >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes >> >> I believe the Apache voting process usually allows 36 hours for a >> vote - which would suggest a vote lasting until Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 >> at 10 AM UTC. Given that we have the prerequisite 3 votes, should we >> move ahead with calling fof a Incubator PMC Vote on the general >> incubator list? >> >> Charles >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Checksums ok, signatures ok, file names ok, directory paths ok. >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > Craig >> > >> > On Jul 23, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Charles, >> >> >> >> No, my vote doesn't carry over. >> >> >> >> But I'll take a look later today. >> >> >> >> Craig >> >> >> >> On Jul 23, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Charles Matthew Chen wrote: >> >> >> >>> +1 >> >>> >> >>> Craig - does your vote carry over to this new vote? >> >>> >> >>> Charles. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> +1 >> >>>> >> >>>> Carsten >> >>>> >> >>>> Charles Matthew Chen wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Sanselan Release 0.94 is ready for a vote. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The proposed release can be found here: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cmchen/dist/incubator/sanselan/0.94/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I've attached the RAT output for the bin and src distributions. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Charles. >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Carsten Ziegeler >> >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>>> >> >> >> >> Craig L Russell >> >> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo >> >> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> >> >> > >> > Craig L Russell >> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> > >> > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > >
